May 28, 2014
That said, Sisi is not so bad, despite his image in the western media as a brutal "strongman".
As this article details, both candidates have big plans for infrastructure and economic development, though they lack clear plans for how to finance these projects.
Sabahi seems more focused on building Egypt's industrial and agricultural capabilities, whereas Sisi has been criticized for focusing too heavily on tourism. Infrastructure and self-sufficiency, especially in agriculture is quite necessary – Egypt, with 80 million people, used to be a breadbasket, but is now the world's #1 importer of grain, and its land is being desertified by "market" pressures.
While Egypt has significant oil resources and still has some industrial power in the areas of textiles, steel, chemicals and autos, it would do well to re-commit to the path of Nasserism, and to be a force of development in the Middle East and Africa.
Both candidates seem essentially committed to this path, and we wish them well in the fight to put Egypt back on the path of national independence, and out of the grasp of the IMF and NATO.